Submissions/Open Evaluation: collecting opinions from the scientific community on published papers
This submission is on the wait list for Wikimania 2014.
- Submission no. 6010
- Title of the submission
Open Evaluation: emerging systems for collecting data from the scientific community on published papers
- Type of submission (discussion, hot seat, panel, presentation, tutorial, workshop)
- Author of the submission
Jonathan Dugan (jmdugan) Elizabeth Seiver (Eliz81)
- E-mail address
- Country of origin
- Affiliation, if any (organisation, company etc.)
PLOS Labs - Public Library of Science
- Personal homepage or blog
- Abstract (at least 300 words to describe your proposal)
PLOS Labs has developed a new tool for evaluating scientific articles called Open Evaluation. In science, peer review takes place at a single time point, in private, and anonymously. We are providing a complement to this: a web-based application for peers to evaluate each other's work at any time point in a paper's life cycle, publicly, with one's real name and identity attached. In this session, we'll discuss progress on the tool and the community with a working demo of OE and show how the results can be aggregated across evaluators and for individual papers.
- Open Scholarship
- Length of session (if other than 30 minutes, specify how long)
- Will you attend Wikimania if your submission is not accepted?
- Slides or further information (optional)
- Special requests
If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with a hash and four tildes. (# ~~~~).
- Chodacki (talk) 15:10, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:23, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Ocaasi (talk) 23:37, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Jmdugan (talk) 22:44, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Kluschek (talk) 00:16, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- mvidrine (talk) 16:42, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 23:11, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- Add your username here.